|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| Response to criticisms of An Act Relative to Special Development Districts, so-called 40T developments | |||
|
CLAIM “allows critical functions of local democratic government to be replaced by the rule of unelected developers with personal financial interests to advance.” |
|||
|
NOT TRUE Special Development District will only have power to finance and build needed public infrastructure for the development. The powers and process for receiving these powers are clearly established in the law and can only be used to carry out the betterment that the city or town government has approved. The Powers are:
|
|||
|
CLAIM “Would eliminate accountability, transparency, and public participation in critical decision-making” |
|||
|
NOT TRUE At least 80% of local property owners and a city or town’s city council, board of selectmen, or town meeting must approve the creation of a special development district. These districts would still need to appear before all relevant local boards as their building project progressed. This process simply allows willing property owners to finance specific infrastructure that a city or town may not otherwise be able to finance. Process of Creating a Special Development District
|
|||
|
CLAIM “Chapter 40T would strike at the heart of New England grassroots democracy. “Special Development Districts” would effectively constitute new developer-run municipalities” |
|||
|
NOT TRUE They require local approval. They are the product of local property owners coming together to finance a project that will mutually benefit them and the tax base of the city or town. The districts would still have to meet every other zoning and permitting requirement. They would need to appear before boards of health, conservation commissions, zoning boards and seek any other relevant state or local permit. |
|||